Search for: "ONLY A MILE v STATE"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 12:51 am
In Jabri v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:51 am
In Jabri v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 pm
This time, it’s 1,500 miles away in Saskatchewan. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:23 pm
Wood storks v. developers. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:49 am
Miller's Ale House, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:48 am
This month in Xplore Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:04 pm
Suppose the federal government wants to force the states to do something which, according to the Supreme Court, is not within its power—for instance to ban firearms within 1000 feet of a school (United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:14 pm
In October 2010, in Xplore Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:42 am
“An action filed in state court may be removed only if the district court could have exercised jurisdiction over the action if originally filed there. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Riegel v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:43 am
Posted by Philip Miles, an employment lawyer with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:58 am
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:52 pm
Coffey v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:01 pm
In Bright v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:15 pm
Posted by Philip Miles, an employment lawyer with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:21 pm
Virginia On July 30, 2010, the Fairfax Circuit Court issued a decision in Daston Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:47 am
The injunction applied only to a small area of town (1.2 miles by 1.4 miles). [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:31 am
Posted by Philip Miles, an employment lawyer with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:35 am
In Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP [2010] UKSC 24, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal of a man subject to a control order based on the argument that confinement to a flat 150 miles away from his family amounted to a breach of his human rights under Article 5 of the ECHR (right to liberty). [read post]
