Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 7,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2020, 9:13 pm
Reference: People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:02 am
In a remand from the Michigan Supreme Court directing the Court of Appeals to consider Lee’s appeal of this requirement, the Court of Appeals affirmed, in People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:05 am
However, the court has found a privacy right where the passenger was given the keys to the car or was on a long road trip and stored their belongings in the car. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:15 pm
But, even as they restricted public interest litigation in the field, legislators actually moved to judicialize the policy still more – and continued to do so even after the Supreme Court substantially altered the law with its Buckley v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Here is the decision, B.C.T.F. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 5:35 pm
Early last month the Department of Justice filed a “Statement of Interest” in Migyanko v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 6:52 am
By Joy P. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:41 am
By Joy P. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) — juridiction pénale — Cour supérieure — compétence — mesure exceptionnelle — rejet sommaire — certiorari — jugement interlocutoire — véhicule procédural — intérêt de la justice — saine administration de la justice — utilisation inefficace des ressources des tribunaux — délai — chance raisonnable de… [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
My students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief, and Daniel P. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
Callahan, 872 P.2d 487, 494 (Utah App. 1994) (trade secret is a property right) with ConFold Pacific, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:27 am
[P]olice arrived shortly after midnight and interviewed Cruz about the verbal altercation. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
at p. 380.) [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 4:53 pm
State, 681 S.E.2d 320 (N.C. 2009) (holding that a nonviolent felon whose crime was long in the past regained his state constitutional right to keep and bear arms); Baysden v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 3:33 pm
Langer v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:12 am
Poplis (the beating of a three year old over a long span, without intent to kill); P. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 5:05 pm
It is perhaps also worth remembering that whilst ICO guidance has long supported the principle of unrestricted access (whatever the circumstances, and however broad the request) it is at pains to assure data controllers it will not use its enforcement powers to “require organisations to take unreasonable or disproportionate steps to comply with the law on subject access“ (Subject Access Request Code of Practice, p.54) This rather undermines the usual… [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:27 am
Judge Polster reviewed the long history of qui tam actions in the United States, and noted that the Supreme Court, in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
