Search for: "People v High" Results 2161 - 2180 of 15,044
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court reports that – The Supreme Court has now received formal notification of the Government’s intention to appeal the High Court’s decision of 3 November in the above matter. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:23 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Most people have cars, and when renting property a parking space is an important consideration. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:30 am by Seeger Weiss
In Spotlight, Seeger Weiss brings you behind the scenes to learn more about the team that fights every day in high stakes, history making cases to bring justice to people who have been injured. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm by Tom Smith
The U.S. government betrayed its total and utter contempt for the First Amendment in a recent filing in the landmark Missouri v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:57 am by Woodrow Pollack
The Prior Art caught up with 3 of the jurors who heard the i4i v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 9:23 am
  Haziness designed to avoid loopholes through which bad persons can wriggle can impose high costs on people the statute was not designed to catch. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 2:19 am by Alfred Brophy
 Lombardo is the author of the very important book on Buck v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 2:28 pm
and a reference to the fact that in less than a year we have seen 3 high-profile cases in which a litigant paid dearly for missing a deadline.First, we had the Supreme Court's outrageous decision in Bowles v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 12:46 pm
Weinstein's point isn't terribly original -- money buys a good defense, even more so than fame in this case -- but at least he documented how that aphorism applies to the trial of People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:21 am by doug
The answer, according to the Masachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in their 1980 opinion in the Begelfer v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:29 am by Laura Orr
" (link to full Statesman-Journal article) 2) Read the September 30, 2009, State v. [read post]