Search for: "People v Person" Results 2161 - 2180 of 31,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Laing J cites Lord Sumption’s definition of harassment in 2013: “Harassment is a persistent and deliberate course of unreasonable and oppressive conduct, targeted at another person, which is calculated to and does cause that person alarm, fear or distress: see Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 78 , para 30 (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm by Amy Howe
The petitioners in that case, Elane Photography v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Different people respond to reading, hearing or viewing the same content in different ways. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
”• Tyler Gothier, who stored “silver and other personal property” in his box and used USPV due to its convenient location. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:29 pm
The proceeds of the stock sales were used primarily to finance the personal lifestyles of Casavant and Edwards. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am by Katy Sheridan
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 4:54 pm by Nick Robinson
--> Guest Post: Vasujith Ram Recently in Lily Thomas v Union of India, the Court held that Section 8(4) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (RPA) was ultra vires the Constitution. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
The Judge recorded the devastating impact that the defendant’s conduct had on the claimant’s private life and lifestyle, not least in terms of her ability to trust and interact with other people in both a personal and work context. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:23 pm
  But for your normal person with a normal life, that's a long time. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
[Its uses] sugges [t] that “the people” protected by the Fourth Amendment, and by the First and Second Amendments, and to whom rights and powers are reserved in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, refers to a class of persons who are part of a national community or who have otherwise developed sufficient connection with this country to be considered part of that community. [read post]