Search for: "People v. Bear" Results 2161 - 2180 of 5,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner, who had been born deaf, appealed a decision by the New York State Division of Human Rights [DHR] dismissing her complaint that the New York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities [OPWDD] had unlawfully discriminated against her in violation of New York State's Human Right's Law [[NYSHRL] when OPWDD rescinded its offer to employ Petitioner "because of her hearing loss without first offering her a reasonable accommodation".Citing Matter of… [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Neither math nor arithmetic were part of the analysis.The core question faced by the court in East Coast Vapor, LLC, v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Users bear the risk, but IP could be doing work underground. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant supports his position on the rulings made in Kent v United States and People v Drummond. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:35 am by Susan Brenner
People do certain things when they kill somebody. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
An adversarial process in one in which the parties bear most of the responsibility for putting their cases before the adjudicator. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 9:21 am by Giles Peaker
She has spina bifida, hydrocephalus, is doubly incontinent, is unable to weight bear, and has recurring pressure sores. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 1:52 am
  The protections are "designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:12 am by Jon Ibanez
The First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco relied on the 2006 California Supreme Court ruling of People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:42 am by SHG
It’s bad enough, both for substantive as well as factual reasons, that the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]