Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 52,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Johnson v. Fink Shows Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in Chicago Can Be Helpful, But Must Be Handled Carefully
25 Nov 2011, 7:43 am
The Missouri case of Johnson v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 10:09 am
On December 27, the Michigan Court of Appeals decided People v Walker, deciding that Walker's access of his wife's password protected email account was a violation of a Michigan statute that prohibits fraudulent access to computers, computer systems, computer programs, and computer networks. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:19 am
Last week the excellent Internet Cases blog reported on an new court case involving Creative Commons licences: GateHouse Media, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:56 am
Recently the United States Supreme Court decided, in the case of Sessions v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:48 am
My intention is to explore the subject through the prism of the1942-3 legal case Regan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am
In the Missouri case, Kruse v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm
(People ex rel. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:17 am
Important Indian Child Welfare Act Case, Brackeen v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
Lord Reed adds a further category of persons to whom a “less stringent approach” to precariousness might be appropriate: people who “might be under a reasonable misapprehension as to their ability to maintain a family life in the UK”. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
" Rumsfeld v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm
Louisiana, as it does not retroactively apply to cases on collateral review Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 4:09 pm
Lee in his place in his decision in Wilson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
In four (4) Brooklyn cases, including Warner v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:39 am
A recent case, Tussey v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Protecting People from Their Own Religious Communities: Jane Doe in Church and State
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Decker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 10:29 pm
People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
An offense that's charged in California in a very high number of cases, and that carries a heavy penalty. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:17 am
Even when, as here, there's no "special" reason to pick out any one particular case in order to do so, and even when there's no seeming time pressure to address those topics that have lingered for almost a century and would happily do so for another if left alone.I like it. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:39 am
But I should hope that we would all agree that a system (here, the County of Fresno's) that tells a criminal defense lawyer "You'll be paid a flat $80,000 to do a death penalty case, and that rate includes all expenses (e.g., for investigation and experts)" creates an unacceptably high risk that counsel might skimp on experts and investigation since, after all, that money essentially comes out of his or her own pocket.Someone's life is at stake. [read post]
