Search for: "People v. Givens" Results 2161 - 2180 of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  In light of the well-established principle in the Strasbourg jurisprudence that politicians must demonstrate greater tolerance toward criticism than others (e.g., Lingens v Austria (1986) 8 EHRR 407), it seems more likely that the courts would conclude the photographs were a matter of editorial judgment – a consideration given particular emphasis in Trimingham v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 1296 (QB), see [306]-[308]. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:15 am by Larry
You may recall that in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:40 pm by Lee Davis
It is more of a question in cases where DNA evidence has nothing to do with the crime, such as in drug cases or property crimes.The case before the Supreme Court is Maryland v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Jeffrey Vlasek
  We've noted a number of such cases in recent weeks but take, for example, the recent decision of Cordy v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by SHG
  None of the sexy stuff that people routinely associate with criminal law. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
If so, what were the precise undertakings of confidentiality given by the individual who created the record, to whom were they given, when, why and in what form? [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm by Eric
Given that the Second Circuit expressly disagrees with the Ninth Circuit's UMG v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 12:13 pm
We reported last November that the Federal Eleventh Circuit issued a landmark opinion called Franza v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
"Given that the state is home to just shy of 12 million people, has it occurred to someone in charge that having 25% of your population on Medicaid might indicate just a wee little problem? [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bennett Capers's "The Crime of Loving: Loving, Lawrence, and Beyond," which appears in Loving v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The letter further stated that “[s]uch conduct is particularly egregious given [her] stature and position . . . as the Executive Director of Financial Management. [read post]