Search for: "Perry v Perry"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 3,329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 8:45 pm
Perhaps there is other language from the legislative history which also supports a prospective reading of section 4.Finally, we have Perry v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:29 am
EMA and Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:36 am
In the Spring, I sent out an article on The Gold Clause Cases that included a discussion of Section Four of the Fourteenth Amendment and the only Supreme Court case interpreting that provision–Perry v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
The Perry case, the only U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:42 pm
See Stang v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm
So, without applying any particular objective criteria, these are the pending cases we’re watching at present: Perry v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
In the 2008 case of Medellin v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:09 am
First, there is the quite stunning concurrence by three judges of the Texas State Court of Criminal Appeals, which explicitly adopts the concurring opinion of Justice Sevens in the Medellin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
Perry, 702 So. 2d 294, 295-96 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) [22 Fla. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Dicey (legislative omnipotence), Thomas Jefferson (departmentalism and active popular sovereignty that does not go dormant in non-Ackermanian moments), James Madison (a system of checks and balances reduced to a short code), or John Marshall (judicial supremacy based on an instrument that did not say a word about judicial supremacy when he wrote Marbury and continued silent on that point when his successors affixed each of their signatures to Aaron v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Perry, The Corporate Governance of Islamic Banks: A Better Way of Doing Business? [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:57 pm
"Bleeding Dodger Blue" focuses on the work of Susman Godfrey attorney Victoria Cook, who, at the time she was called into the McCourt v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
The last point is the takeaway from the recent case of United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:25 am
In Perry v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:22 am
In Perry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:12 am
Kelly Tillery writes about the Supreme Court's 2010 5-4 decision to stop arguments in Perry v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:10 pm
” The 7-2 decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Medellin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:53 am
In short, there is no public policy reason to have a debt limit less than infinity--it's all about political rent-seeking.On the constitutional question, Section Four of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Court's analysis in Perry v. [read post]
