Search for: "Peters v. Doe" Results 2161 - 2180 of 3,582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and… [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:01 pm by Thomas James
By contrast, if an art collector enters into a contract to purchase an original painting by Peter Doig, it is almost certainly going to be a contract for a non-fungible product (the painting.) [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:52 am by Peter Mahler
” The De Well Case A prime example of the perils of the client-negotiated buy-out agreement is found in De Well Container Shipping Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:03 pm
See generally, Peter B. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:30 am by INFORRM
Latest Regulatory Decisions Latest decisions of the Scottish Information Commissioner: Latest Decision Notices from the Information Commissioner’s Office: Latest decisions of the First-tier Tribunal, General Regulatory Chamber [Information Rights] Peter Dun v IC EA/2010/0060: FOI Act 2000, s 40 (personal data). [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 1:38 pm
  He refers to the Supreme Court of Canada decision Peter v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:50 am
The IPKat's friend, IP practitioner and fellow blogger Peter Groves is very excited that his IP Dictionary has now been published by Edward Elgar Publishing. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:47 pm
At first instance in the Federal Court Justice Middleton found that DKSH had not engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct or passing off by marketing and selling its Euroline coffee plunger: Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Peter Bodum A/S [2010] FCA 23. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 4:39 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
That case, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Steamless USA, LLC, stems from a 2007 contract between a contractor and steel manufacturer for the construction of mills in the manufacturer’s steel plant. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
 (Props to Tom Colby and Peter Smith for a longer discussion of this inconsistency in their academic work.) [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
There is probably much I have missed, but the sketch above is a beginning. [1] Peter H. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 19 December 2018 Sir Peter Openshaw found that the defendant in the harassment case of Foskett v Ezeugo was in contempt of court in that he had breach an injunction on 175 occasions. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Peter, I’ve done some looking into the question of whether “by or for a member” would support derivative standing to seek dissolution. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (IAM), (Patent Circle), India takes open source approach to drug discovery: (Patent Lens), India: Indian Bayh Dole Bill: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Does India need Bayh-Dole? [read post]