Search for: "Petition of Smith"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Clark appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
They petitioned the Tenth Circuit to review that decision. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
ROBERT BRINCKERHOFF, individually, and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC, Appellees. 4th District.Child custody -- Modification -- Competent substantial evidence supported trial court's modification of time-sharing -- Trial court did not abuse its discretion by giving mother ultimate decision-making authority as to medical issues if parties were unable to agree where court found that parties did not communicate and that their relationship was beyond acrimonious and considered other… [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Black & Red Inc Western District of Michigan at Grand RapidsJULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am
Barnes and Smith v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
The trial court did not err in denying the petition. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am
The respondents filed an answer in which they generally denied the petition’s allegations of wrongdoing. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 10:07 am
The district court found the juror credible and denied the petition. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:00 am
Smith STEAM Academy ("STEAM Academy"). [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:48 pm
In any event, he accepted the position and the Smith's house was placed on the market. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:50 pm
ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition finding. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 9:49 am
Finally, Standard asserts that the Court’s 2011 decision in Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
And the court will have at least two petitions (Small v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
§ 315(c), which permits the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Director, in instituting an inter partes review (IPR), to “join as a party to that inter partes review any person who properly files a petition under section 311 that the Director … determines warrants the institution of an inter partes review under section 314. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 12:50 pm
So practically, a cert petition should ask the SCt: whether a defendant may be held liable for infringement where the patent discloses nothing equivalent to the products or processes accused of infringing. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
In Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Contrary to petitioner's contention, we do not find his case to be one of "the rarest of cases" in which an exception to the general rule applies (Matter of Taranto v City of Glen Cove, 212 AD3d at 828 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1211). [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Contrary to petitioner's contention, we do not find his case to be one of "the rarest of cases" in which an exception to the general rule applies (Matter of Taranto v City of Glen Cove, 212 AD3d at 828 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1211). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
