Search for: "President v. State" Results 2161 - 2180 of 22,892
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Matt Murphy
 This is the standard of proof Georgia created when instructed not to execute the mentally retarded in Aktins v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 10:26 am by Jon
The opinion of Judge Michael Malihi of Georgia's Office of State Administrative Hearings (OSAH), issued on February 3, is essentially correct, because the claim was not properly framed. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:54 am by Ravi S. Nagi
Virgin Islands who was a plaintiff in a similar lawsuit, Segovia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:46 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
President Obama's immigration reform via executive fiat was all but repealed by the Supreme Court in an unusually brief decision in United States v Texas that stated in its entirety, "[t]he judgment is affirmed by an equally divided  court. [read post]
22 May 2019, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
The prospect that President Trump might invoke the Insurrection Act in order to have authority either to bring state National Guard forces of federal armed forces into service in relation to the capture and removal of migrants inside the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Susan Rose-Ackerman
If imported to the United States, congressional review would freeze rulemaking for all but the most anodyne texts—even if it could circumvent the holding in INS v. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 10:53 am by Nina Perales
Nina Perales is vice president of litigation for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and counsel in La Union del Pueblo Entero v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:09 am by Zoe Bedell
Circuit handed down its decision in the most recent iteration of Al Bahlul v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm by Anthony Gaughan
President Trump will undoubtedly replace him with a pro-life justice hostile to Roe—as the president has promised. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm by INFORRM
alp judgment continues a strong tradition in European Court jurisprudence where freedom of expression prevails in cases of insult or defamation of heads of state, presidents or high ranking politicians (for example, Lingens v. [read post]