Search for: "STATE v CLARK" Results 2161 - 2180 of 3,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
A high-profile week at the Leveson Inquiry, with evidence from Rebekah Brooks, the MailOnline editor Martin Clarke and Andy Coulson (see Natalie Peck’s Inforrm roundup). [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting this morning in the Supreme Court is the appeal of Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, listed for two days in front of a panel of five (L Hope, L Walker, L Kerr, L Clarke, L Dyson). [read post]
13 May 2012, 11:30 pm by Stan
Thanks to Don Clarke, I can now say that it appears as though my suspicions were well founded. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am by INFORRM
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am by Blog  Editorial
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am by Alice Himsworth, Olswang.
The case was heard in April by the Supreme Court Justices Lord Hope, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson and Lord Reed. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Tuesday 8 May 2012 in front of Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson is the hearing of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
This week will see the State Opening of Parliament. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm by INFORRM
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:39 pm by Shima Baradaran
There has been much discussion in the news, blogosphere, and general ruminations about the Supreme Court's January opinion in United States v. [read post]