Search for: "STATE v MURPHY" Results 2161 - 2180 of 2,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 8:38 pm by George M. Wallace
  We do note that the most auspicious Judge Cardozo, in Murphy v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am by Jeff Gamso
The other day I talked about the decision in Holland v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:11 am
Firstly, it follows a pattern seen in the recent decision of the joined cases in Football Association Premier League and Murphy, in which the starting point for any discussion of originality begins with the principles recited in Infopaq. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:23 pm by Monica Williamson
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:05 am by Joy Waltemath
Reversing the district court’s decision on those claims, the court remanded the reinstated claims to the district court (Ellis v Houston, February 3, 2014, Murphy, D). [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
The contractual intent of the parties was not dispositive in the independent contractor versus employee analysis, and facts pointing to independent contractor status did not alter the economic realities of his relationship as a hospital employee (Murphy v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm by Sam Murrant
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]