Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 21,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2010, 6:24 am
A similar argument was used in BMG v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
As tax rates increase or products are banned from sale, consumers and producers search for ways around these penalties and restrictions. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
BFP v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 3:46 pm
Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:58 am
The Court’s upcoming ruling in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 10:28 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:43 am
In the case of Kaler v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
Their prominence in public policy considerations is further enhanced by individuals being actively responsible for filing their income taxes, in contrast to the indirect payment of sales and excise taxes. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:40 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio agreed, and stated that an appraisal from a licensed appraiser would be the best evidence of the personalty’s value. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Hogaboom v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Based upon case law to date, however, I think we would get the same outcome in the Buckeye State, on facts similar to the facts in Stambovsky v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am
Their prominence in public policy considerations is further enhanced in that individuals are actively responsible for filing their income taxes, in contrast to the indirect payment of sales and excise taxes. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
Last week, in Friel v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:58 pm
State Board of Equalization, 191 Cal.App.4th 1259 (2011) and Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:08 am
In Haight v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:27 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:27 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 9:08 pm
” Blough v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 1:35 pm
Yesterday the Utah Supreme Court issued its ruling in the case of Southam v. [read post]
