Search for: "Sex Offender Issues" Results 2161 - 2180 of 11,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2013, 10:12 am by Stephen Bilkis
Albany County is not unique among localities in enacting residency restrictions for sex offenders. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 10:04 am by Stephen Bilkis
You can also hire the New York City Sex Crime Attorney to resolve your issues regarding sexual abuse or violence. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
By contrast, the issue of downward departure is raised in a different context. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
No points were added under Factor 14, "Supervision Following Release," because, at the time, Defendant was to be supervised by a parole officer with expertise in handling sex offenders. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Act requires that sex offenders be assessed a "risk level" at the time of sentence or prior to release from incarceration. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 11:49 am by Stephen Bilkis
There, the Court found that the Kansas sex offender civil commitment statute — which is similar to New York's statutory scheme - raised no ex post facto issues because the statute was civil in nature and imposed no retroactive punishment. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:11 am by Steven Eversole
We are also abreast of legislative issues and other agendas that may impact the lives of alleged sex offenders. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:00 pm
We are also abreast of legislative issues and other agendas that may impact the lives of alleged sex offenders. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:09 am by Stephen Bilkis
The Attorney General filed a petition seeking a determination that Respondent is a detained sex offender who has a mental abnormality such that he should be subject to Article 10 civil management. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In view of the foregoing, the court found probable cause to believe that PH was a sex offender in need of civil management. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 10:11 am by Stephen Bilkis
This is a proceeding wherein the defendant challenges a determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, designating him a risk level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C, the Sex Offender Registration Act upon the Supreme Court's denial of his application for a downward departure to risk level one. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
The following were the basis for the court’s ruling: On the issue of whether there was probable cause to believe that PH was a sex offender requiring civil management: The first problematic issue here was the term “sex offense” as defined under the law, what was included or excluded. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 3:48 pm by David Fraser
Oddly out of place, Clause 11 seems to expand the categories of identifiable groups for the advocating genocide crime under Section 318 of the Criminal Code:(4) In this section, “identifiable group” means any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, or mental or physical disability. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:09 pm
Where do elderly sex offenders go when they can no longer take care of themselves? [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:50 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The issue in this case is whether the board erred in designating defendant as a risk level three sexually violent offender upon his release from custody. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If the offender is found by the court to be a "dangerous sex offender requiring confinement", the offender is placed in a secure mental health facility. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 2:16 pm
The issue in this case is whether the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommendation that the defendant be assessed a risk level two is proper. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:13 am by Stephen Bilkis
Respondents in these cases are the subjects of sex crimes offender civil management petitions pursuant to Article 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:00 am by Gene Quinn
He was ordered confined for twelve months in a home detention program (later reduced to 8 months) and to participate in a program for the treatment of sexual deviancy, and to register in the Washington State Sex Offender Registration program. [read post]