Search for: "Slate v State"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2007, 3:45 am
Curtis V. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
Dahlia Lithwick has this audio segment with Alex Chadwick on NPR's "Day to Day" and this article at Slate discussing the church-state separation case. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
The Machine is Us/ing Us," created by Michael Wesch, Assistant Professor of Anthropology Kansas State University. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 1:40 pm
Whether that should control is another thing, but today's decision was not written on a blank slate, appearances in the majority's opinion notwithstanding. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 9:46 pm
The Legal Service reminds EU member states that they can't just go off and make their own agreements to cover areas that fall within the EU's exclusive competence. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
At Slate, Dahlia Lithwick wrote this piece which states that "American support for the death penalty is diminishing - except at the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:06 pm
That case was pulled and United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Schwartz, a law professor at Touro College, writes that the decision in Paul v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 8:45 pm
Judy Chevalier has this review at Slate. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:06 am
Speaking at Iona College in New York Tuesday, Justice Antonin Scalia said critics of the Bush v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:41 am
At Slate, Emily Bazelon posted her comments here about the state of the Sentencing Guidelines in the wake of Cunningham. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 5:02 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 5:24 am
Schaerr, representing California and 20 other states that entered the case, Smith v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 5:09 am
[Serles v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:47 am
Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:59 am
But noncitizens like Hamdan don't have the sort of "substantial connection with our country" that justifies invoking the constitutional right to habeas corpus, the Supreme Court ruled in 1990, in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:14 am
United States [Volokh Conspiracy] Carrington v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 8:37 am
In an en banc ruling today in US v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 4:50 am
As noted by the WSJ Law Blog, the Court released same-day printed transcripts in Watters v. [read post]
