Search for: "State v. Duke"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
The scales have swung back and forwards starting with the laissez faire approach of the House of Lords in the famous Duke of Westminster case in which it was said that it was open to a taxpayer to arrange his affairs in whatever way he chose in order to minimise the tax payable. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
Smith In the six years since the landmark Kelo v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
., Amber Taylor responds to her heckler by explaining how he also could get into Harvard.David Lat at Above the Law reports on the case of Steinbuch v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:03 pm
The pending Dukes v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Below, I elaborate first on how transaction costs doom the aims of age-verification and verifiable parental-consent laws, and then consider the state of First Amendment precedent for anonymous speech as it relates to age-verification laws. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:21 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977) and Griggs v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am
Orcutt’s First Law states that “Before things get better, they must get much worse. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:52 pm
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011) What This Means For Employers While it certainly is not difficult to imagine the EEOC or any entity positing its best numbers when publishing a self-review, employers absolutely need to pay attention to these results. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
Guest Post: Checking the “Staats” – in Broadening Reissue Practice, We Are Stuck in the “Doll”-drums
6 Mar 2012, 11:28 pm
, 2011 Duke L. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
As the courtroom saga unfolds, M&A players and practitioners should keep a watchful eye – not since In re IBP Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
If you fear the Kochs, it is comforting to have a Duke University historian on your side. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am
These unlawful marketing activities were responsible for Pfizer paying the largest fine in United States history. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
Nevertheless, there are some admirable works including, very recently, Harvard Business School professor Eugene Soltes’s Why They Do It and Duke professor (and former Enron prosecutor) Sam Buell’s Capital Offenses. [read post]
