Search for: "State v. Harris" Results 2161 - 2180 of 5,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm by Amy Howe
Bay Mills Indian Community and Harris v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 10:11 am by Tom Smith
“And before that, you have 23 States Attorneys General (including Kamala Harris at the time) persecuting the Little Sisters of the Poor and then Democratic senators (including Harris at the time) suggest in a hearing on a federal judgeship the Knights of Columbus were an extremist group and then try to establish a religious test for federal office in violation of Article V of the Constitution—a step that brought protests from the Presidents of… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:24 am by Chris Attig
It’s not law yet, of course, but there are a lot of ways that the decision in Shea v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:24 am by Chris Attig
It’s not law yet, of course, but there are a lot of ways that the decision in Shea v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:24 am by Chris Attig
It’s not law yet, of course, but there are a lot of ways that the decision in Shea v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
Harris Associates – Denied 9-Nov Graham v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am by Harold O'Grady
He ran for Vice President of the United States in 1948 on the Republican ticket with Thomas Dewey, who lost to Harry Truman, the Democratic incumbent. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:30 am by Fred Rocafort
The post Chinese Nationals Face Land Restrictions in Florida appeared first on Harris Bricken Sliwoski LLP. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. [read post]