Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 44,177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 9:48 am
In Arista Records v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 5:51 pm
In Fernald v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
In the context of a public agency seeking an injunction to prohibit repeated requests for public records by an inmate of a state prison, a court is permitted to consider the identity of a person making a Public Records Act (PRA) request. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:29 pm
After the agreed statement of facts was read into the record, counsel for Ward made a motion for judgment of acquittal. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm
"] From today's decision of the Florida Court of Appeal in Doe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am
Avila v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:10 pm
As Bob McCarty reports here, ACCA today rejected the appeal and petition for new trial in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:45 am
State, 176 S.W.3d 90 (Tex. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:45 am
State, 176 S.W.3d 90 (Tex. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:20 pm
The record on appeal in this case indicates that all three requirements were met. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:49 am
Pomavilla-Zaruma v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
In Pineda v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 12:49 pm
2-27-2010 Pennsylvania:(HARRISBURG) With strong bipartisan support, Senator Gene Yaw, R-Loyalsock, introduced Senate Bill 1231 which requires transient workers who have a record of sexual offenses to register with the state police every 30 days. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:52 am
The Court agreed, noting that the skimpy record below gave little reason to overturn the judge's decision below in denying the TRO, given the petitioner's burden to prove 1) the likelihood that the petitioner would succeed on the merits, 2) the 'balance of inconvenience' between granting or denying the TRO, 3) the petitioner would suffer irreparable injury, and 4) the public interest.The Court also rejected the petitioner's argument that Lamb v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:52 am
In selecting lead counsel for a stockholder derivative litigation, the Court of Chancery applies the factors set forth under Hirt v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
Colvin, June 12, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:57 am
In a case styled Holmes v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 1:55 am
Where, however, there is an apparent inconsistency in the verdicts at a nonjury trial, but where the trial judge on the record satisfactorily explains the apparent inconsistency, the guilty verdict may stand. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:10 am
Wilner (retired, specially asigned).From the headnote of the opinion:Before a restitution order is granted, Section 11-603 of the Criminal Procedure Article requires that the victim of the crime or the State request restitution and that competent evidence supporting the amount of the restitution order be presented to the trial court. [read post]
