Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 43,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2017, 5:52 am
In selecting lead counsel for a stockholder derivative litigation, the Court of Chancery applies the factors set forth under Hirt v. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 10:29 am
The Supreme Court of Virginia issues one opinion today in which it addresses an appeal by the West Virginia & Appalachian Laborers’ District Council challenging the State Corporation Commission’s approval of certificates of public convenience and necessity for Sycamore Cross Solar LLC’s proposed 240-megawatt solar facility. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 11:28 am
But Donati v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:49 am
Pomavilla-Zaruma v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 5:08 pm
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Supreme Court Records and Briefs, 1832-1978 ProQuest Supreme Court Insight United States Reports (Official opinions of the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:48 pm
” (citing Virmani v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 5:05 pm
In a 2001 Appellate Division case, State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 5:05 pm
In a 2001 Appellate Division case, State v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 7:57 am
In Owens v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:00 pm
Delaware’s High Court ruled in Murfey v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:57 am
In a case styled Holmes v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:26 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 12:49 pm
2-27-2010 Pennsylvania:(HARRISBURG) With strong bipartisan support, Senator Gene Yaw, R-Loyalsock, introduced Senate Bill 1231 which requires transient workers who have a record of sexual offenses to register with the state police every 30 days. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
In Pennington v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 10:10 am
Securities and arbitration is a specialty of ours as we employ some of the most experienced and track record backed lawyers in the state. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
In Arista Records v Lime Group, the Court rejected that RIAA's contention that it is entitled to a separate statutory damages award for each direct infringement induced by LimeWire, holding that adopting that argument would lead to an "absurd" interpretation of the Copyright Act. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 10:37 am
State v. [read post]
