Search for: "State v. Still"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 44,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2020, 9:45 am
The post California Businesses Considering Furloughs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 1:38 pm
Still, the statue could not abrogate a vested right. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 12:08 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:01 am
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Earlier this year, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm
This left open a "liberal approach" with respect to similar complaints brought through other paths, such as a state v. state application.Moreover, Ntwari viewed the decision as part of an accumulation of matters against Habré, sometimes called "Africa's Pinochet" on account of the brutality of his reign in Chad. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:51 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:06 pm
For instance, in tweeting out an announcement of its proposed replacement for the Clean Power Plan vacated in West Virginia v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
He highlights the various code elements that bring about the controversial data sharing, finding that: Therefore, regardless of your login state to Epicurious [the site he tested], any time you load (not just review) a recipe or any other Beacon-enabled page, Facebook knows exactly what you are looking at. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:22 am
State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The Secretary of State refused to allow this. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 7:03 am
That case, Kiriakos v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 11:44 am
Oh right, there still needs to be a breach of a state law duty. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 7:53 am
I made my way to the US Supreme Court press box for JURIST Monday morning to listen to oral arguments in Gutierrez v. [read post]
