Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 2161 - 2180 of 20,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 12:00 am
In light of recent comments, questions, and Facebook posts, I thought I’d take a moment to clarify some misconceptions about the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:49 am by Dennis Crouch
Assuming the Beer judges still have the three Williams dissenters on their side, they can win on the merits with two of the four newest justices. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
Eleonora raised that a useful reform would be one for private copying, and wondered whether there is still a need to distinguish between primary and secondary legislation distinction. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 2:22 pm
Justice Cullity’s reasoning on this point in Easingwood v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:21 am
A recent decision handed down by the state's high court in Washington v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
The case of B v B [2012] EWHC 1924 (Fam), decided today, contains another judicial warning upon the preparation of court bundles. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:18 am by James Bickford
With the long conference still a week away, several Justices have filled their last days of summer with public appearances. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm by Ilya Somin
Interestingly, the Court was much more sensitive to considerations of context in its recent decision in NRA v. [read post]
There are many individuals and groups in Michigan who lost as a result of yesterday's United States Supreme Court decision in Schuette v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:03 am by V.Venkatesan
By Renu GuptaGuest BloggerThis post refers to Supreme Court's decision in State of Uttaranchal v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Adam Chandler
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:23 am by Nabiha Syed
Coverage of the Court remains at a near stand-still in the New Year, although new activity is likely beginning on Friday, when the Justices are scheduled to meet for their January 7 Conference; our “Petitions to Watch” for that Conference are available here. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 6:52 am by Dennis Crouch
   The Supreme Court then took up the case and again affirmed, with Justice Black writing a short opinion for a unanimous court. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:45 am
In our view, this third version of the ban is still a Muslim ban, and still illegal. [read post]