Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 16,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2008, 9:04 am
Grange v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:47 am
Del. 2007); Zhang v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:00 am
See, e.g., Apilado v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:32 pm
On 4 March 2019, the decision in Venables & Anor v News Group Papers Ltd & Ors ([2019] EWHC 494 (Fam)) was handed down. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:39 am
Parents for Privacy v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:02 pm
On June 17, 2010, the Supreme Court held in New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:31 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:01 am
We have launched strong objections to that and are hopefully that will not be the final decision. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:21 am
Without putting our undergraduate-level statistics knowledge to the test, we would say that there are some strong feelings about this one, and that maybe the alarmists and crazies weren't so off base after all... [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 2:33 pm
United States mirrors the claims from Trump impeachment 1.0] In Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 5:15 am
The judgment in the case of Big Brother Watch and Others v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:36 pm
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 11:13 am
United States and Gall v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:51 pm
Here is the abstract: In Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
Today, small-business owners celebrate the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Janus v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:19 am
On July 17, the state high court ruled in Barbuto v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:31 am
Here is the abstract: The perception is strong that Supreme Court cases decided by a five-to-four vote, especially controversial decisions striking down federal or state laws, destabilize the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:06 am
Cir. 1923; State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:36 am
The DSM-V has not been adopted, nor is there any agreement that the following diagnosis should be added. [read post]
