Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 2161 - 2180 of 10,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by eileen peck
The man allegedly hacked into the Los Angeles Superior Court system. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm by AALRR
Superior Court we summarized here has received a great deal of deserved attention, but there are a number of other cases pending before the court of significance to California employers in a variety of industries  Those pending cases include the following:Whether The Mixed-Motive Defense Applies To Employment Discrimination Claims Under The California Fair Employment And Housing Act. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:50 am by Daria Diaz
A lawsuit filed October 16, 2012, in Alameda County Superior Court on behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity, Earthworks, Environmental Working Group, and Sierra Club, alleges that the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (“DOGGR”) has failed to consider or evaluate the risks of fracking as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:58 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
Superior Court (1996) (13 Cal.4th 893, 923, 926, 935) case required the PUC to have exclusive jurisdiction, the court stated the facts fall outside this precedent because the complaint in the present case was centered on stray voltage from a substation, not voltage generated by power lines. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:14 pm by AALRR
Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal held that while an employer is required to "provide" to non-exempt employees at least one unpaid, duty-free meal period of at least 30 minutes each workday of more than 6 hours, the obligation to "provide" required meal  periods means to make the required meal periods available and not to ensure that employees take all required meal periods. [read post]
Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal. 4th 944 (“Grafton”)), in most instances forum selection and choice-of-law provisions have been respected by California courts. [read post]
Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal. 4th 944 (“Grafton”)), in most instances forum selection and choice-of-law provisions have been respected by California courts. [read post]
Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal. 4th 944 (“Grafton”)), in most instances forum selection and choice-of-law provisions have been respected by California courts. [read post]
Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal. 4th 944 (“Grafton”)), in most instances forum selection and choice-of-law provisions have been respected by California courts. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 12:17 pm by The Health Law Partners
On May 5th, 2022, a class action lawsuit was filed in Humboldt County Superior Court by a member of PHC claiming that the healthcare provider did not protect the patient data of up to 850,000 individuals, or notify all impacted individuals of the breach. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
The District Court for the Southern District of California certified a consumer class asserting violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) by defendant Bennett Law, PLLC. [read post]