Search for: "Supreme Court of New Mexico" Results 2161 - 2180 of 4,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2015, 7:47 am by Lori Paul
 He applied for admission to the New York Bar, but despite a “high marking” and unanimous recommendation from the bar examiners, he was turned down by the state supreme court in 1887 because he was not a citizen. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:09 am by David DePaolo
It's a tale of contrasts in this morning's WorkCompCentral News.There's joy and elation within the "opt-out" crowd that the Oklahoma Supreme Court denied taking on original jurisdiction in the constitutional challenge to that state's recent reform law, and in particular the option employers have to provide alternatives to The System.Those challenging the law are more circumspect, saying that the court's decision at this time wasn't… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:38 am by Steve Vladeck
Thus, Mata’s opening brief offers two principal contentions: that the courts of appeals have plenary jurisdiction to review BIA denials of motions to reopen, especially after in light of the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Kucana v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am by John McFarland
Those witnesses advocated re-opening the adjudication process by creation of a new state agency or court similar to one created in New Mexico. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Democrats in general, however, have generally at least been supportive of the IRS as an agency that must enforce the law—a law that, as former Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes famously stated, is “the price we pay for civilized society. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:03 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:18 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Confrontation Clause aficionados will recall the Supreme Court's decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:32 am by Sebastian Brady
In other Pakistan news, the Times reveals that a Pakistani court has ruled that former CIA Islamabad station chief Jonathan Bank and former C.I.A. lawyer John Rizzo will face criminal charges for their roles in directing drone strikes in that country. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The New Mexico RFRA expressly applies only to religious burdens imposed by “a government agency,” so that state’s supreme court understandably held it inapplicable in private litigation in the highly publicized Elane Photography case. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:59 am by Jim Sedor
New Mexico – How a Reform Bill Loses Its Teeth in 60 DaysKRGW – Michael Sol Warren (New Mexico In Depth) | Published: 3/27/2015 New Mexico lawmakers debated a bill this year that would have reveal to the public how lobbyists go about influencing legislators. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
In making these arguments, the defendants would be substantially aided by the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2013 ruling in the Allergan litigation, in which the Court held that an earlier dismissal by a California court was preclusive of an action in Delaware courts by a different set of plaintiffs, as discussed in detail here. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  The option is now openly available in Oregon (since 1998), Washington (since 2009) and Vermont (since 2013) by statute, and in Montana (since 2009) and New Mexico (since January 2014) by court decision. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:30 am by Tom Smith
The studio said that New Mexico’s RFRA nonetheless barred the suit; but the state’s Supreme Court held that the RFRA did not apply “because the government is not a party. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:24 am by John McFarland
Struggles over fracking bans have been in the news for some time in Pennsylvania, Colorado, Ohio, New Mexico and other states. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:57 am
Alberico, 116 N.M. 156, 861 P.2d 192 (New Mexico Supreme Court1993), for evaluating the admissibility of scientific expert testimony. [read post]