Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 2161 - 2180 of 21,974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 7:16 am by Richard Montes
Williams, the defendant claimed that CPLR 4401-a required expert testimony as to both parts of the informed consent analysis. The Fourth Department disagreed holding that "expert testimony concerning what a reasonable person would have done in plaintiff’s position is not necessary to maintain a cause of action premised upon lack of informed consent." [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:22 am by bhamdefenseatty
Qore argued that a Bradford employee had observed the improper work, and had testified that “in hindsight,” it had been a mistake to rely on Qore’s testing. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:10 am by Matthew Borges
In a filing with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the plaintiffs alleged that they were disparately impacted by the pre-employment skills test or that their applications were stalled in some other way. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Plaintiff Save the Plastic Bag Coalition (Coalition) lost a third consecutive published appellate decision in its litigation campaign to require EIRs for virtually all local ordinances that ban or restrict the use of single-use plastic bags in favor of alternatives deemed environmentally superior. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Jay McDaniel
A divided panel of the Second Circuit, however, took a giant step back from the test in reversing a trial court decision in favor of the plaintiffs in a hot news dispute involving the dissemination of securities analyst report summaries. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 11:20 am by Russell Cawyer
 In the threshold remuneration test adopted by most of the Courts addressing the issue, the plaintiff-volunteer must make a threshold showing that she received remuneration or some other significant indirect benefit. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:45 am by Joseph Seiner
Continue reading "The Motion to Dismiss for Workplace Plaintiffs after Iqbal and Twombly" [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:34 am by Philip Pillsbury
Disputes over whether a plaintiff has waived privilege can be especially difficult in federal court, where there is no single test to determine waiver. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
First, the basic test for determining causation remains the "but for" test. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:54 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The workplace arguably had severe or pervasive sexual harassment, and the test governing city and federal retaliation claims is substantially identical, as least as to whether management's response would dissuade a reasonable employee from complaining again. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 6:14 pm by Marty Lederman
  Second, that pre-Smith "least restrictive means" test, which RFRA restores, is not the same as the test the Court employs when it evaluates a facially discriminatory law; and therefore the Court has erred in referring to the RFRA test as “the most demanding test known to constitutional law. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
  The plaintiffs identified the following negligent acts:   Mylan allegedly a) failed to use ordinary care in designing, testing and manufacturing [MFTS] so as to avoid the high risk to users of unreasonable, dangerous side-effects……. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:23 pm
According to the plaintiffs, the FDA report shows that PCA knew they were shipping products that were likely to be contaminated. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:39 am
The plaintiff disputed the assessment, claiming he had severed his domicile in Maryland and established a domicile in Maine.The court applied the two-pronged test for determining a change in domicile articulated in Shenton v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:18 am by Rita Handrich
Most of us know that in order to manage reactions to a personal injury story the plaintiff begins with the bad acts of the defendant as opposed to the sad story of the plaintiff. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:15 am
" Defendant contended that the plaintiff's patents failed the "machine" prong of the Bilski test because the claims only require aspects of a general purpose computer. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:00 pm by Jon L. Gelman
 Another plaintiff alleges CIGNA charged her more than $2,000 for a blood test, claiming the procedure cost more than $17,000. [read post]