Search for: "Texas v. United States"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 8,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas dismissed Ultraflo’s Texas state law claim, finding that the general scope of federal copyright law preempts the claim. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas dismissed Ultraflo’s Texas state law claim, finding that the general scope of federal copyright law preempts the claim. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas dismissed Ultraflo’s Texas state law claim, finding that the general scope of federal copyright law preempts the claim. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 6:56 am
The case is styled, Turbodyne Corporation et al. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:57 pm
But in 1999, the Voting Integrity Project brought suit against the Secretary of State of Texas in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, alleging that portions of Texas Election Code pursuant to early voting violated 2 USC 7, which states: “Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November, in every even numbered year, is established as the day for the election, in each of the… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:47 pm
Earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
This was stated by the Texas Supreme Court in 1995, in the case, Republic Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:22 pm
She became the face of the largest gender discrimination class action suit in United States history, Dukes v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:39 am
Same-Sex Marriages As of right now, Obergefell v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:30 am
After remand from the Federal Circuit, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled that, due to the penal nature of the false marking statute, the appropriate penalty for marking a product with an incorrect or invalid patent number should be assessed at the maximum price the articles were sold, rather than the profit margin or economic benefit to the defendant. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court has recognized only limited circumstances in which the usual rule does not apply. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:56 pm
More recently, in 2014, many states—including Connecticut, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Texas—instituted quarantines aimed at curbing the spread of the Ebola virus. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 4:23 am
Expert testimony allocating damage between covered and excluded causes may satisfy this burden of proof, according the United States 5th Circuit, in Fiess v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:51 am
” United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 1:00 pm
Hamlett v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Apr. 8, 2015), and Kraft v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 8:49 am
Nat’l Arena League, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Texas, Fort Worth Division.May 16, 2017.FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGEHAL R. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
In Institutional Capital Management, Inc. v. [read post]
