Search for: "The Supreme Court of New Mexico" Results 2161 - 2180 of 4,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 10:15 am by Kate Fort
Having disparate interpretations of ICWA was certainly not the intent of Congress in passing a federal law, and conflicts with the rationale of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am by Ben
" Last year, the U.S Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal in the matter by the Estate, meaning that that only the final 10 volumes have copyright protection until December 31, 2022. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:14 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
McDonald’s, a case in which a New Mexico jury awarded a 79-year-old customer $2.86 million after spilling hot coffee in her lap. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Notably the court found the source of the concept to be a 1981 Supreme Court of Canada decision[6] (it is not a “new” concept as Eli Lilly argues in its NAFTA factum). [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:00 am
In the community property states of Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin, community property is usually divided 50-50. [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:48 am by SHG
  Not Supreme Court justices, but most people. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm by Jon Gelman
However, Boden, Reville, and Biddle (2005) found that in the five jurisdictions they examined (California, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin) permanent partial disability benefits only replaced between 16 and 26 percent of earnings losses in the ten years after the workers’ were injured, which meant the “replacement rates do not approach the 2/3 benchmark for adequacy. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:15 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Won’t Hear Sharpe James’s Bridgegate Argument, Campaign Cash Appeal” by Bill Wichert for Newark Star-Ledger Ethics “FDA Could Approve Drugs for New Uses on Less Data: Draft law” by Toni Clarke for Reuters New York: “JCOPE Watchdog Denies Conflict as Attorney” by Chris Bragg for Albany Times Union Washington: “WaLeg: Rep. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:47 am by Lori Paul
 He applied for admission to the New York Bar, but despite a “high marking” and unanimous recommendation from the bar examiners, he was turned down by the state supreme court in 1887 because he was not a citizen. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:09 am by David DePaolo
It's a tale of contrasts in this morning's WorkCompCentral News.There's joy and elation within the "opt-out" crowd that the Oklahoma Supreme Court denied taking on original jurisdiction in the constitutional challenge to that state's recent reform law, and in particular the option employers have to provide alternatives to The System.Those challenging the law are more circumspect, saying that the court's decision at this time wasn't… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:38 am by Steve Vladeck
Thus, Mata’s opening brief offers two principal contentions: that the courts of appeals have plenary jurisdiction to review BIA denials of motions to reopen, especially after in light of the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Kucana v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am by John McFarland
Those witnesses advocated re-opening the adjudication process by creation of a new state agency or court similar to one created in New Mexico. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Democrats in general, however, have generally at least been supportive of the IRS as an agency that must enforce the law—a law that, as former Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes famously stated, is “the price we pay for civilized society. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:03 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:18 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Confrontation Clause aficionados will recall the Supreme Court's decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]