Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 2161 - 2180 of 15,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
., Room LJ-119, First floor, Thomas Jefferson Building:In his 1858 "House Divided" speech, Abraham Lincoln accused Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney, outgoing President Franklin Pierce, president-elect James Buchanan, and Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas of a conspiracy to perpetuate slavery in the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Above the Law
* Rahimi could be written in a way that helps Hunter Biden, but let's face it: U.S. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 8:19 pm by Patent Docs
Thomas Cotter, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota School of Law; Charlotte Jacobsen of Ropes & Gray; and Jenifer Ward, executive counsel-corporate IP technologies, operations and transactions, General Electric Co. will analyze: • The current state of relevant case law, including Halo v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The NCC's podcast on "The Constitutional Legacy of Watergate" is here.Lawbook Exchange’s August 2024 catalogue of Scholarly Law & Legal History is here.Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman explain What [They] Did and Did Not Argue in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
LaGrand (Germany v United States of America) (2001)Cameron Miles22. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:01 pm by Bridget Crawford
 If not, the SIPA student would be like Clarence Thomas when he said in his confirmation hearings that he had never discussed Roe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Justice Thomas agreed on the result, though argued that the unanimous jury trial guarantee of the Sixth Amendment majority should be seen as applied to the states via the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, not the Due Process Clause (his view as to the Bill of Rights more generally). [read post]