Search for: "Tony Mauro"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Tony Mauro at the BLT provides an overview of the day at the Court here. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Briefly: Tony Mauro reports at The National Law Journal that former deputy U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
” At Law.com (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that Clinton “suggested Sunday night she might avoid lawyers who worked at ‘a big law firm and maybe clerked for a judge’ without ‘real life experiences’ in picking nominees for the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am
Meanwhile, Tony Mauro has an op-ed in USA Today arguing that “craftiness and candor” are the keys to Kagan’s success at her hearings, especially given her 1995 article opining that Justices ought to be more candid. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:01 am
Justin Driver so suggests, in Tony Mauro's recent Freedom Forum column.) [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” Additional coverage comes from Lyle Denniston at Constitution Daily and Tony Mauro at The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required) At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Jane Schacter writes that “what signals there are in the majority opinion about the larger conflict suggests that issue may well be resolved against the broadest claims made by merchants seeking religiously-based exemptions from the command of antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
” Tony Mauro at the Blog of the Legal Times reports that Robert Long, the attorney appointed by the Court to argue the Anti-Injunction Act segment of the health care challenge, has stated that “‘there appears to be no justice’ who believes the anti-injunction law should keep the Court from getting to the merits of the health care law challenges. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
At The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports on last week’s Supreme Court Historical Society re-enactment of “the 1971 Supreme Court case Clay v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:12 pm
In Legal Times, Tony Mauro writes, "Justices reject death penalty for child rape. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
In the National Law Journal, Tony Mauro discusses the possibility of a nominee without prior judicial experience. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm
Ben Barros has already posted valuable analysis of the case here, and Tony Mauro has additional thoughts about the recusal here. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 am
” At the First Amendment Center, Tony Mauro discusses last week’s decision in Sorrell v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:22 pm
Tony Mauro writes, "Illinois abolishes death penalty," for National Law Journal. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
At the Blog of LegalTimes, Tony Mauro reports that five brothers were admitted to the Supreme Court bar on Monday, “possibly an all-time record. [read post]
2 May 2007, 12:57 am
Supreme Court correspondent Tony Mauro reviews the exhibit -- and provides his own view of the nation's first female justice. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 5:47 am
” Five of the top Supreme Court reporters appeared on our show: Marcia Coyle, Lyle Denniston, Amy Howe, Tony Mauro, and David Savage. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 4:22 pm
"Executions Declined Nationwide in 2008," is Tony Mauro's post at The BLT.Concern about adequate legal representation for those facing capital punishment was also evident in 2008, the report states, with court rulings in Utah and New Mexico holding that the death penalty cannot be pursued without more funding for indigent representation. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Tony Mauro has an interesting article on the case titled “Coin toss decides which advocate will argue key patent case. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro offers some Supreme Court-related beach reading, observing that with “all the dramatic recent twists and turns at the Supreme Court, fiction is getting closer and closer to real life. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
That is, of course, an intrinsic problem with claimed “textualism” — if the text is less than pellucid, you get to go by what you had for breakfast — but Tony Mauro’s report reveals an even deeper problem with the work as a whole: Scalia himself has been accused of saying he is bound by the text of a statute or constitutional provision – and then ruling according to his personal preferences anyway. [read post]
