Search for: "U. S. v. Grant"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 6:13 am
In her June 14, 2012 decision in Matter of A.H. v C.B., Queens County Family Court Judge Edwina G. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
I-2 U 31/16). [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 6:52 am
Young's rule for final/permanent spousal support; and (5) granting Mr. [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:01 am
Nevertheless, such a philosophy did not always coincide with conservative interests, as when Burger led the court in the unanimous decision United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 12:01 pm
S. 36, 40-41 (1950). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:24 pm
Gross, 576 U. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:19 pm
If Bowman were granted an exception, patents on seeds would retain little value.Bullock v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 10:41 pm
" Imbler, 425 U. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 3:11 am
[TTABlogged here].The Board basically follows the CAFC's decision in University of Notre Dame du Lac v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 3:44 pm
,S. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
S. 731, 749 (1982))); 520 U. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:45 am
However, Lieb at Law, P.C. v Lodato 2021 NY Slip Op 51089(U) [73 Misc 3d 1219(A)] Decided on October 28, 2021 District Court Of Suffolk County, Fourth District Matthews, J. illustrates the quirky CPLR 203(d) offset situation. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
Granted issues question: (1) whether the lower court erred in affirming the finding of guilty as to Specification 3 of Charge III when it found that an online chat containing the line “u free tonight” was sufficient to prove attempted enticement (2) whether the Army Court of Criminal Appeals erred by affirming forfeiture of all pay and allowances when the convening authority did not approve any forfeiture and (3) whether an Article 134 clause 1 or 2 specification that… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:36 am
Court Throws Lifeline to Procedurally Defective Dissolution Action Lamorena v Malloy, 2020 NY Slip Op 31927(U) [Sup Ct NY County May 22, 2020, involves a dispute between 50/50 shareholders of a corporation that operates a pharmacy. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:30 am
As UB Law Professor Garrett Epps explains in The Atlantic, “[u]nder Supreme Court rules, it takes four justices to grant review of a case, but five to grant a stay of a lower-court ruling. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:28 pm
Danny Farley v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm
U. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 9:58 am
Van Hook, 558 U. [read post]
