Search for: "UNIVERSAL UNDERSTANDING, INC."
Results 2161 - 2177
of 2,177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Justice Hassell said he didn't understand it, that it didn't make any sense. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:28 am
Notes[1] A distinction must be made between general deterrence and special deterrence: "General deterrence: dissuading potential offenders from offending at all by way of the punishment administered for a particular offence", Barbara Hudson, Understanding Justice: An Introduction to Ideas, Perspectives and Controversies in Modern Penal Theory, Buckingham, England: Open University Press, 1996 (mentioned here: [www.sagepub.com]) and "Special deterrence refers to an… [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:13 pm
Gonzales (has also been cited as Prelinger Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:41 am
In Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 8:32 pm
Since then, I've taught at New York University Law School. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 7:34 am
Given the runaway success of Viagra (if measured only by the number of emails that flood the Internet), you can understand why one U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
• The family of a diabetic woman who suffered permanent brain damage accused Medtronic Inc., a manufacturer, of selling an unsafe insulin pump and the University of Washington Medical Center of medical malpractice. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:05 am
Bijan Dastmalchi, President and Co-founder of Symphony Consulting, Inc., will be the instructer. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 12:33 pm
A new study by Northeastern University Professor Walter Carl and John Cass at Backbone Media Inc. answers what makes a successful corporate blog? [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:45 am
"Not much for laughs, but economists think it's funny, which shows they understand their limitations. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 11:20 pm
They were originally intended as educational products to help children understand diseases. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
No exceptions were filed to the judge's finding that the Respondent did not violate Section 8(a)(5) by implementing a memorandum of understanding that was agreed to by the Union and the Respondent, but was subsequently rejected by a vote of the Union's members. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 5:05 am
Professor Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown University Law Center.Douglas W. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 4:25 pm
Services, Inc. (7-RC-22798; 347 NLRB No. 58) Byron Center, MI July 28, 2006. [read post]
19 Jul 2006, 1:03 pm
The leading caselaw discussion of the DRM question is probably Universal City Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2006, 10:20 pm
About a month ago, Baris Karadogan, a Partner at ComVentures, posted this incredible list of Web 2.0 Companies on his blog From Istanbul to Sand Hill Road. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
The Vioxx VerdictsThe legal community is still abuzz about the $253 million verdict against Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
