Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 9,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its long-awaited ruling in the case of Google v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm
Nelson in 1972 and last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The most interesting supplemental brief was filed by the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am
United States, in which the justices considered the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 10:01 am
Rumsfeld and Ziglar v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
In David Swartz, et al., v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 11:49 am
Rumsfeld and Ziglar v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 am
" Ashe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 1:35 pm
The report outlines how the United States may be falling behind on certain artificial intelligence research, particularly compared to China. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:40 am
” In the United States, wiretapping and surveillance issues continue to appear before the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:44 pm
United States, No. 16-1371. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:19 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today rejected the government’s latest attempt to delay consideration of whether the NSA’s tapping into the Internet backbone is legal in Jewel v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 10:01 am
Rumsfeld and Ziglar v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
” Furthermore the European Court has recognised in B v United Kingdom; P v United Kingdom ([2001] 2 FLR 261) that the Article 6 requirement to hold a public hearing was subject to exceptions. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am
On September 9, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Costco was willfully infringing Tiffany & Co. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm
Matthews v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:59 am
SHAPIRO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm
United States, 530 U. [read post]
