Search for: "United States v. Stevens"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 4,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2020, 8:54 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) (explaining that when "no single rationale explaining the result [of a case] enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds'" (quoting Gregg v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:45 pm
Ice, which deals with Blakely's applicability to consecutive sentencing determinations, and United States v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:23 am
A state of war existed between the United States and Spain between Apr. 21, 1898 and Apr. 11, 1899. [read post]
Bilski v. Kappos: SCOTUS Doesn't Recognize Business Methods Patents But Doesn't Prohibit Them Either
28 Jun 2010, 12:07 pm
Billions, potentially trillions, of dollars of revenue are dependent on the patent laws of the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:43 pm
United States, 130 S. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:47 am
(The Court in Hamdan indicated that the DTA's references to "the Constitution and laws of the United States" includes "the law of war," 126 S. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:04 am
(The Court in Hamdan indicated that the DTA's references to "the Constitution and laws of the United States" includes "the law of war," 126 S. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:13 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
The 1963 Sherbert v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Time, Inc., 468 U.S. 641 (1984), this Court struck down a statutory provision that limited photographic reproductions of United States currency, but exempted reproductions “for philatelic, numismatic, educational, historical, or newsworthy purposes to content that was educational or newsworthy. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
The author considers whether Stevens's comments might indicate his willingness in this term's United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
United States, in which the court will consider whether, to convict defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:12 pm
It may have a bearing on what is shaping up as the first attempt in Congress to write a new law reacting to the Supreme Court's decision last week in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 9:24 am
Judge Marsha "Calls 'em Like She Sees 'em" Berzon, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893). [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 2:55 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision in 1977 by a 2-1 margin, with each judge writing separate opinions. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:47 am
Note also that the Court’s fractured decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
After evaluating her claim, the district court ruled in favor of Match.com, citing Title 47, Section 230 of the United States Code, known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
Matal, and Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
