Search for: "United States v. Washington"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 8,890
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2022, 1:10 am
Former Art Dealer Sentenced To 7 Years For $86 Million Fraud Scheme, The United States Department of Justice, (May 23, 2022), https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/former-art-dealer-sentenced-7-years-86-million-fraud-scheme ? [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 4:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:48 am
”In the famous Slaughter-House cases of 1872, the Supreme Court stated that this qualifying phrase was intended to exclude “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:34 am
The Washington State Supreme Court faced up to its own earlier error, holding in State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 5:51 pm
Vidal Font has procured trademark applications and represented clients before the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the Puerto Rico Trademark Office, and has litigated intellectual property matters both at the state and federal levels. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am
And just yesterday, SCOTUSblog’s own Lyle Denniston covers a potential “Citizens United sequel” unfolding in Washington State. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
The court found that although the provisions of United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:46 am
The FSIA is the federal law that protects foreign states from lawsuits, and makes foreign sovereign property located in the United States immune from attachment.The plaintiffs argued that Section 1610 of the FSIA makes a "commercial activity" exception by declaring that “[a] foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts … in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue and that property … is… [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Carranza v Nordstrom Inc., 2014 WL 10537816 (C. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
S., at 693; see United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) opined that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) could still mail medications used for abortion because DOJ interpreted the Comstock Act to apply to “unlawful use. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
" Well, the answer takes a bit of mental gymnastics, so click through the jump to read on.The judge in Mosley concluded that "Accidjazzed Evening" was a "United States work" by determining: A “United States work” exists if it was first published simultaneously in the US and another country. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:41 am
Washington. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:20 pm
I will miss not only Paul's superb advocacy on behalf of the United States, but also his wise counsel and keen legal analysis. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:49 am
Last week, we in the United States celebrated the Fourth of July, which landed right in the middle of the week on Wednesday. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:49 am
Last week, we in the United States celebrated the Fourth of July, which landed right in the middle of the week on Wednesday. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
