Search for: "Waites v. State"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 12,155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2020, 3:07 pm
In March 2020, the SEC issued an award of $450,000 to a compliance professional who “reported concerns about the relevant conduct internally within the company and then waited 120 days before reporting to the SEC. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:11 pm
Nutreance LLC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
In Landry v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:54 pm
However, applicants should not wait for guidance to be published to apply. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
In Bonsmara Natural Beef Co., et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 12:30 am
V. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:03 pm
The majority’s rule in Seila Law v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 11:09 am
As we wrote here, AB5 codified and expanded the “ABC test” adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:17 am
In Matal v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
On the other, some would argue that it creates too high a bar if it lets platforms leave up highly damaging material that we think they should be able to recognize as illegal without waiting for a court to act. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Waiting for Guidance – could be like waiting for Godot Unfortunately, a “wait and see” approach is not really a viable option. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:24 pm
Eligible Costs Subject to certain limitations, borrowers are eligible for forgiveness in an amount equal to the sum of the following costs incurred or paid (as described below) during the 8-week or 24-week covered period (as defined in Section 1106): Payroll costs including salary, wages and tips, up to $100,000 of annualized pay per employee (for 24 weeks, a maximum of $46,154 per individual, or for 8 weeks, a maximum of $15,385 per individual), as well as covered benefits for employees (but not… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
The government referenced Vasquez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:43 am
” While the Abdullahi v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:43 am
” While the Abdullahi v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:29 am
In filings submitted last week, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the Bureau) both opposed and moved for summary judgment in PayPal, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:07 am
Now, probably more than ever, a particular focus should be put on the data exporter’s evaluation of the legal developments in the recipient state. [read post]
