Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 2161 - 2180 of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2020, 8:03 am by David Oscar Markus
So, please, if you dont mind, let’s treat court hearings as court hearings, whether Zooming or not. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by SHG
  And the same is true of judges who sit quietly by as defendants are overcharged, or threatened with a superseding indictment if they don't take the plea, or the defendant whose choice is to take thirty years instead of life after trial, when the evidence, if it wasn't trumped up by lying cops, would justify only ten.Do prosecutors wield too much power? [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:51 am
We're paid by the county, and it's not much. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm by Florian Mueller
But we all know Qualcomm isn't going to go out of business in the years ahead.The security amount is just meant to provide reasonable protection to Apple. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Sixth Circuit: We don't have jurisdiction over the appeal because the judge's qualified immunity argument questions factual inferences drawn by the district court. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 12:34 am
If that is not making good on a threat, then I don't know what is. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:45 am by Anthony Ciolli
That doesn't mean that the plaintiffs don't have a right to gripe -- I just see zero legal support for their claims. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:59 am
For those who dont, ‘Hateful Eight’ is [or might have been] the American director’s next movie. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by Bexis
  Sad to say, we dont know of any case (if we’re wrong, tell us) where what we’ve just discussed is discussed in any organized fashion – save one. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:55 pm
The complainant could see the courtroom, including the Judge and defendant, although the extent to which the witness could see the courtroom participants is in dispute, and could hear the proceedings in the courtroom. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:44 pm by Robichaud
 Some people feel that because they’re innocent they dont need a lawyer. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 4:51 am by SHG
Aren't we exceptional? [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
That result was rejected by the Court in Lohr, and neither the MDA nor Riegel supports it.2009 WL 331470, at *7 (citations and non-rant portions omitted).The problem is we don't know if the premise of the rant is true or not, because plaintiff failed to plead anything other than "I got hurt, therefore defendant must have violated the FDCA" - which is even more of a stretch than "I got hurt, therefore defendant must be liable. [read post]