Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit: We don't have jurisdiction over the appeal because the judge's qualified immunity argument questions factual inferences drawn by the district court. [read post]
23 May 2010, 2:46 am
Don't tell me you don't take all this into account when advising your clients. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 7:38 am
Jurors don't know this, but once they render the verdict and head home, the lawyers will spend the next few years fighting about whether the verdict represents true justice, and whether the jury awarded too much money. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 12:34 am
If that is not making good on a threat, then I don't know what is. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 1:44 am
This means that we don't have to waste scarce resources prosecuting, defending and incarcerating the same people over and over again. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
Following the adage that, if you can’t say anything nice (and are prevented from doing the opposite), don’t say anything at all, we haven’t blogged before about Rowatt.3. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
We Don't Need Your Stinking Constitution (June 3, 2004)16. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 2:31 am
They don't tend to break on the stand. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 9:08 am
Don’t scoff: there seems to be a growing judicial skepticism to the things. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
Wouldn't it be better if we could work on admitting and fixing the problem before that particular spotlight? [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:22 am
We need to believe that judges will listen to us with at least one ear open, give us the time of day, show us that modicum of respect that recognizes this isn't all a big game with a pre-determined outcome, where we all play our respective roles and yet the finale comes no matter how well we've acted. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 8:19 am
But it shouldn't have to go that far. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
" Fine, I'm all for it; evidence is a great thing (except for the zillion times the defense is moving to suppress it, but don't get me started). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
Whatever happens tomorrow, we’ll have your back don’t worry. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:33 pm
So, I don't want to be dismissive of the current economic climate and lump all new lawyers into the ';it's not a profession it's a meal ticket' basket. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 5:00 pm
[Having known several Texas prison chiefs with that honor it's probably appropriate to quote Woody Allen - "I don't want to achieve immortality through my work, I want to achieve it by not dying.] [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:05 am
One analogy in favor of liability, though, is to dram shop liability (we don't have that in Maryland, though the law may be changing). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
As long as you are a lawyer, fulfill the obligation you undertook to your client and don't expect a judge to make up for it afterward. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
When we do it for someone factually innocent, it's even better.Still, I don't know any criminal defense lawyer who wants to be Perry Mason. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:32 am
While we don't have a Supreme Court star at the top or our tree this year (Ashcroft v. [read post]
