Search for: "Young v. State" Results 2161 - 2180 of 8,887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2023, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Some might argue that neither v-Lex or Fastcase is young enough genuinely to be labelled “disrupter”, but both have built reputations valued for innovation, expertise and quality, and their combined reach is extensive, maybe reflecting their maturity and adult behaviours. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:55 am
Twain’ Connecticut Yankee v. 63   Clarence had slumped to his knees before I had half finished.... [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  For example, the federal government sometimes “confesses error” on the question presented, and aligns itself with its adversary on that question — or even on the invalidity of the judgment below, as in Young v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:08 pm
This is all a bit harsh, I think, and surprisingly so.Andrew Gregor is hanging out online in 2011 or so and having a fun, sexy conversation with someone young. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:34 am
Without any other low-level entry positions, young workers feel compelled to take these jobs. [read post]
The court considered the Prisons and Young Offenders Institutions (Scotland) Rules 1994 SI 1994/1931 (“the Prison Rules”) and Articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:03 am
  The AmeriKat met Philippe Campolini (Simont Braun) several years ago at the Young EPLAW Congress over a beer in Brussels. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:31 pm by Meagan Burrows
The ACLU has blocked all of these abortion bans from taking effect, and abortion is still legal in all 50 states. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:10 am
”While a dissent by Justice Marshall Rothstein raises the spectre of an adversarial model where police services can be withheld from the public, Young points to the determination of the majority that states there’s nothing inherently adversarial about an independent collective bargaining model. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 6:18 pm
The Circuit Court consulted the legislative history of the relevant portion of section 507(a)(8), which "Congress intended to codify the rule established in Young v. [read post]