Search for: ""citizen's united""
Results 201 - 220
of 4,397
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
End Citizens United had alleged Scott and the New Republican PAC, a group he formerly chaired, violated election laws prohibiting coordination between candidates and outside groups. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 1:58 pm
In their 31-page filing in the Supreme Court, the students – represented by James Bopp, the conservative lawyer who brought the landmark campaign-finance case Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 4:37 am
Overturning the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United, mandating a balanced budget, establishing a positive right to vote, banning the burning of the American flag? [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
For example, in 2009 the Justices heard oral argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
Law professors can talk dispassionately and abstractly about what sorts of content-neutral speech restrictions are needed to protect residential privacy, the ability to use health care facilities without undue difficulty, or the rights of citizens not to have their speech unduly trammeled by powerful corporations. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 11:54 am
Everything Justice Stevens said about business corporations generally in Citizens United also applies to newspaper corporations. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:57 am
Well, I wouldn't go so far as that—but of course in one of the posts, I was quite expressly channeling my inner Justice Stevens, writing in an opinion (Citizens United) in which I actually disagreed with him on the bottom line. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Finally, sometimes just the risk of suspension may pressure politicians and other speakers to avoid taking positions a company dislikes, as Justice Stevens warned about in Citizens United.[74] To be sure, being banned by Twitter and Facebook might in some situations be good publicity, especially if one is trying to make a name for oneself: It's still rare enough to be a news story. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
The key statutory language forbids the application of laws “in a manner which results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:10 am
But the link to the argument in the Citizens United dissent may help explain why some top scholars on the Left, such as Erwin Chemerinsky,[41] Michael Dorf,[42] Genevieve Lakier,[43] and Nelson Tebbe,[44] have suggested similar regulations.[45] Some advocacy groups on the Left have likewise accused platforms of improperly restricting their speech.[46] And of course even many conservatives, while generally more skeptical of government regulation of private actors, have long been… [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
End Citizens United says the Trump campaign solicited and directed donations to America First Action and allege the super PAC was the only outside, non-campaign group “approved” by Trump or the Republican National Committee to donate to. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:06 am
Burwell—the Court can withdraw that "capital" in the broad decisions like Citizens United v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:00 pm
" (According to Jeff Toobin, Justice Souter's draft Citizens United dissent along these lines caused the Court to re-argue the case). [read post]
7 May 2021, 5:55 am
Matsuo, KPMG LLP, on Monday, May 3, 2021 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Disclosure, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Risk, Risk disclosure, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation Proxy Season: Early Highlights and Emerging Themes Posted by Richard Fields and Elizabeth Morgan, King & Spalding LLP, on Tuesday, May 4, 2021 Tags: Board composition, Boards of… [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:57 am
” And “Citizens United is even less fact-dependent,” he argued. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 9:08 pm
Prior to Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am
California’s arguments Like the United States, California urged the court to subject the disclosure requirement to “exacting scrutiny” rather than “strict scrutiny. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:19 am
Here’s the Monday morning read: Most Americans want to end lifetime Supreme Court appointments (Chris Kahn, Reuters) Biden Clashes With His Allies in Supreme Court Green-Card Case (Greg Stohr, Bloomberg) Court Packing Is a Dangerous Game (Philip Hamburger, The Wall Street Journal) The Supreme Court hears a case next week that could make Citizens United even worse (Ian Millhiser, Vox) How the Supreme Court Helped Create ‘Driving While Black’ (Christopher Wright… [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 2:30 pm
“The Supreme Court hears a case next week that could make Citizens United even worse; The Court’s new majority could make it much easier for big spenders to influence American politics in secret”: Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox. [read post]
