Search for: "*1**u.s. v. Poole" Results 201 - 220 of 832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2020, 11:21 am by Eric Goldman
Backpage * District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’– Doe 1 v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 9:05 am by Florian Mueller
Nokia's excuse was that those agreements allegedly weren't relevant (not only U.S. courts but even some--if not all--German courts would disagree). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:13 am by CFM Admin
SEC RIAs to pooled investment vehicles may avoid both the quarterly statement and surprise examination requirements by having audited financial statements prepared for each pooled investment vehicle in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles by an independent public accountant registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This guidance closely tracks IRS Notice 2018-88 and provides that an ICHRA offers “affordable” coverage if the difference between the amount of the reimbursement available through the ICHRA and the cost of self-only coverage for the lowest cost silver plan available to the employee on the ACA Exchange (in other words, an employee’s out-of-pocket cost for coverage on the ACA Exchange after reimbursement from the ICHRA, if the employee purchases the lowest cost silver plan) does not… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 2:13 am by Keith Mallinson
“Goal: Reduce Apple's net Royalty to Qualcomm” [1]Since the 1990s, Apple among others have taken various and elaborate steps to "Devalue SEPs. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am by Phil Dixon
Second, the court must determine whether the jury pool was infected with actual prejudice from the publicity. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The Commission counters that established precedent conclusively shows that the contracts are securities (SEC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 1:30 am
Thus it was that as a result of Gideon v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Defendants sold approximately 2.9 billion digital tokens called “Grams” at discounted prices to 171 initial purchasers worldwide, including more than 1 billion Grams to 39 U.S. purchasers. [read post]