Search for: "*u. S. v. Cohen"
Results 201 - 220
of 272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2018, 4:27 am
(See Aaron v Roemer. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 3:50 am
Slip Op 51092(U). [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
Internet and Social Media Germany’s competition authority, the Bundeskartellamt, has placed restrictions on Facebook’s data-processing activities. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
This is amply demonstrated by Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. v Pollack 2019 NY Slip Op 50793(U) Decided on May 17, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J.. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:17 am
Justice Dufficy’s legal analysis beginning at page 6 of his decision includes an excellent review of the statutory standard and interpretative case law governing dissolution of LLCs, citing familiar cases such as 1545 Ocean Avenue, Doyle v Icon, and (pardon the self-promotion) a couple of cases I litigated and won (Natanel v Cohen and Sieni v Jamsfab, LLC). [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:24 pm
Rosania v Gluck As far as I know, the first case to raise that lurking question post-Raharney is Rosania v Gluck, 2019 NY Slip Op 32087(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 8, 2019], decided earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:33 pm
” People v Norman, 2004 NY Slip Op 51851(U). [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
’” (Cohen v Cohen [N.Y. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:01 am
The same reluctance to intervene without dissolution and a full accounting applies to disputes between members of a limited liability company. while the Limited Liability Law does not expressly authorize a buyout in a dissolution proceeding, it is an appropriate equitable remedy in such a proceedin9 (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d 917, 920 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am
The Larsen Decision The first was Larsen v Larsen (2022 NY Slip Op 32415(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 18, 2022]), in which Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman considered and rejected a pre-answer dismissal challenge to a shareholder derivative suit based upon the suing minority shareholder’s alleged conflict of interest. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
Even Judge Avern Cohen, who was highly sympathetic to the speech code before him in Doe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 8:35 am
" In the same footnote, Nokia explains that one can deduce from the findings of fact and conclusions of law in FTC v. [read post]
The Oral Partnership Operating as a Corporation: Is it a Partnership? A Corporation? Can it be Both?
15 Mar 2021, 4:59 am
Rule #3: [T]he existence of an oral agreement is generally a question of fact which cannot be summarily determined on a motion to dismiss (see Martin v Cohen, 17 Misc 3d 1116 [A] [Sup Court, Suffolk County 2007]). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
Cohen, What Is True? [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 3:32 am
“To have standing in a derivative suit regarding an LLC, a plaintiff must own portions of the LLC” as a member (Cohen PDC LLC v Cheslock-Bakker Opportunity Fund, LP, 2010 WL 4530242, 2010 NY Slip Op 33108(U) [Sup Ct, NY County 2010]. [read post]
