Search for: "*u. S. v. Haves" Results 201 - 220 of 9,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 1:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  However, Justice Schaffer gives a much better response in Landau, P.C. v LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross ;  2010 NY Slip Op 50620(U) Decided on April 7, 2010 ;  Supreme Court, New York County ;  Schlesinger, J. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:12 am
The significance is that it would have been the first church property dispute which the Court has accepted for review since Jones -- some 35 years ago. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:06 am by sam
SUPREME COURT REQUIRES USPTO DIRECTOR TO HAVE DISCRETION TO REVIEW DECISIONS BY PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD (PTAB) appeared first on Staas & Halsey LLP. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:10 am
Had the Court of Appeal not published this opinion, I would never have known that ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft "accounted for nearly 65% of all moving violations for driving in transit lanes and bicycle lanes, obstructing bicycle lanes and traffic lanes, failure to yield to pedestrians, and illegal U-turns in business districts" in San Francisco.That's a shockingly high number. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 6:49 am
S. 752 (1969), and applied to vehicle searches in New York v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:46 pm by JT
P.C. v MVAIC, 2010 NY Slip Op 51885(U)(App. [read post]