Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 201 - 220
of 11,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2022, 7:24 am
Carefully reading the language used in the decision should point you to which of the above elements were not met. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
This article should be read in conjunction with our May 2015 article on Mental Health Examinations. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:06 pm
Within the body of the Driver's License Restoration section of this blog, I have tried to examine the License Appeal process from every possible angle. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 10:46 pm
Lars de HaasV.O.An EPO board held that observations filed by third parties during inter partes appeal must be disregarded by the board, unless they concern amendments during opposition or appeal, in which case the board has discretion whether or not to consider the observations in the examination of the amendments. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
If you were disqualified for psychological reasons, the first thing you should do is hire an experienced and qualified disqualification appeal lawyer, who thoroughly understands the appeal process and will examine your particular case to determine whether or not you have grounds for a psychological disqualification appeal. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:41 pm
The Board will still need to examine whether identical third-party registrations show the commercial weakness of the Opposer’s mark, but they will not disregard them simply because the Applicant did not provide proof of use. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
A defendant in California appealed his conviction of murder on the grounds that he was unable effectively to cross-examine the prosecution’s key witness. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:12 am
It is not the responsibility of the Texas Court of Appeals to hear or examine new evidence or determine whether the jury responded appropriately to the evidence and testimony provided. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:12 am
It is not the responsibility of the Texas Court of Appeals to hear or examine new evidence or determine whether the jury responded appropriately to the evidence and testimony provided. [read post]
7 May 2018, 8:30 am
How the Panel of Judges Analyzed the Case In agreeing with the defendant, a panel of judges first examined the standard of review. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:02 pm
In my recent blog post on the Newmont Canada Corporation decision I examined the importance that the Federal Court of Appeal attached to credible evidence put forward by taxpayers in tax appeals. [read post]
17 May 2018, 7:00 am
Toben, Texas Tech University School of Law Professor Cassie Christopher, Chief Justice Jeff Rose of the 3rd Court of Appeals in Austin, Texas Board of Law Examiners chair Harold “Al” Odom, Texas Board of Law Examiners vice chair Augustin “Augie” Rivera Jr., Texas Board of Law Examiners member C. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 2:48 pm
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board affirmed the refusal, but the district and circuit courts ultimately ruled in favor of the applicant. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:08 pm
Attorneys for the 37-year-old filed an appeal to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals last week. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:08 pm
Attorneys for the 37-year-old filed an appeal to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals last week. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 12:12 pm
SPC applicants will be able to challenge a negative (or partially negative) opinion by filing an appeal to the Boards of Appeal of the EUIPO, and subsequently to the General Court of the EU, and ultimately, where admissible, to the Court of Justice (CJEU). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:10 pm
Rogers) The case is a short but interesting read on Miranda triggers and Article 31(b) comparisons. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:24 pm
Duffy of The Legal Intelligencer has authored an article summarizing the Third Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-1689 (3d Cir., Dec. 30, 2008), which the article calls a “ruling that is sure to be required reading for antitrust lawyers. [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:16 am
Read the opinion [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:12 pm
One month after the appeal was heard, the Full Court has rejected Nature’s Blend’s appeal that Nestlé used Luscious Lips as a trade mark. [read post]
