Search for: "ABC, INC"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2020, 1:21 pm
Background On AB 5 AB 5, as of January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
Background On AB 5 AB 5, which took effect on January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:01 am
As we explained here, AB5 codified and expanded the “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:04 pm
In re Caremark Int’l Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:48 am
Dynamex held that workers should be classified as employees instead of independent contractors unless they pass the “ABC Test”. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 3:34 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 8:49 am
The new law expanded the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 10:55 am
For example, in Time Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm
Canada Ontario Inc v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:45 pm
The ABC Test of Employee Misclassification The 2019 law was designed to codify a 2018 California Supreme Court ruling, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 10:43 am
AB-5, which went into effect on January 1, 2020, codified the California Supreme Court’s ABC Test for independent contractors as set forth in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 2:19 pm
Note: There are relatively few reported opinions involving attempts by non-airlines to invoke ADA preemption as an indirect air carrier; they include ABC Charters, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 11:09 am
As we wrote here, AB5 codified and expanded the “ABC test” adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 3:19 am
Facts: Facebook Inc is a company incorporated in the US (‘Facebook US’), while Facebook Ireland is in Ireland. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am
Most famously, in Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am
On Wednesday 24 June 2020, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:42 pm
While most COVID-19 test results won’t draw the widespread coverage and public interest that Elliott’s diagnosis did, businesses generally and health care providers, health plans, health care clearinghouses specifically need to recognize that coverage of the Elliott outrage will heighten awareness and therefore their need to properly handle and protect COVID-19 or other infectious disease and other testing, diagnosis, treatment and other medical and disability information collected or… [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am
On Thursday 18 June 2020, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland). [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
Amazon.com, Inc., a U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential… [read post]
