Search for: "ALLES v. INTERSTATE POWER CO."
Results 201 - 220
of 469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Interstate 35/Chisam Rd., L.P. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Interstate 35/Chisam Rd., L.P. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
And they concluded that modern dormant Commerce Clause precedents rest on two primary principles that mark the boundaries of a state authority to regulate interstate commerce.[9] “First, state regulations may not discriminate against interstate commerce; and second, States may not impose undue burdens on interstate commerce. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
After all, the Tenth Amendment simply reserves to the states those powers not given to the federal government; yet in Alden, Congress had exercised its enumerated power to regulate interstate commerce to impose the obligations of the Fair Labor Standards Act on state employers; so there was nothing reserved to the state. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:25 am
As for the first proposal, the Thirteenth Amendment can be added as a justification for using congressional power to prohibit discrimination against all the groups listed in the proposed legislation. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:41 am
Currin v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:42 pm
Indeed, the federal ban on marijuana is responsible for Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 11:37 am
American Express Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:03 am
Liberty Apparel Co.). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
Since then, the Court has consistently held that Congress enjoys broad constitutional power to regulate commerce having any significant interstate component or effect, including wholly intrastate economic activity by individuals that creates substantial effects on interstate markets. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm
Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co., 429 U.S. 363, 374 (1977). [3] United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:28 pm
I would be very happy to get rid of Raich, a dubious decision that concluded that Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce allowed it to forbid the possession of medical marijuana that had never crossed state lines or been sold in any market. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
After all, in the 2015 case of Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am
(Note that, to my knowledge, the Cato Institute filed no amicus brief in Kansas v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
And they all seemed to support the mandate at the oral arguments. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
Co., 219 Ill. 2d 430, 302 (2006) At the end of the day, courts are about power. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co., 973 P.2d 527, 542 (Cal. 1999)), which don’t follow anybody else’s pattern. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
American Express Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:09 am
” He takes the same view of the government’s Tax Clause argument: While this case raises a host of complex constitutional issues, all seem to distill to the single question of whether or not Congress has the power to regulate — and tax — an individual’s decision not to participate in interstate commerce. [read post]
