Search for: "ANDREW P. THOMAS" Results 201 - 220 of 447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am by Laura Sandwell
In the Privy Council this week from Tuesday 7 February 2012 over two days are the appeal and cross-appeal of [J & O Operations Ltd & Anor]; Eloise Mulligan and Grace Wong v The Kingston & Saint Andrew Corporation and The Kingston & Saint Andrew Corporation v [J & O Operations Ltd & Anor]; Eloise Mulligan and Grace Wong. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
Perez; the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fisheries Office of Law Enforcement, Northeast Division, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Andrew Cohen; and the Food and Drug Administration Office of Criminal Investigations, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Thomas P. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Perez; the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fisheries Office of Law Enforcement, Northeast Division, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Andrew Cohen; and the Food and Drug Administration Office of Criminal Investigations, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Thomas P. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:47 am by lopeznoriega
Muchas juntas de trabajo carecen de objetivos claros y sólo representan pérdida de tiempo. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am by Allison Trzop
Other coverage comes from Thomas Merrill for this blog, Richard Wolf of USA Today, and Jeremy P. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:47 am by Patricia Salkin
Andrew Gowder, Jr., Austen & Gowder, Charleston, SC   Matthew S. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Mark P Gergen, Case for a Charitable Contributions Deduction, The, 74 Va. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm by Sandy Levinson
  This is the true meaning of American exceptionalism" (p. 149). [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Chap. 1, p. 52; 1844 Miss. chapter 1, p. 58. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am by Florian Mueller
Landowners, for example, cannot exclude others from entering their land to save lives or property or to avoid some other serious harm.[8] Relatedly, in upholding the inter partes review process for administratively reconsidering patents, the Supreme Court recently held that "[p]atents convey only a specific form of property right—a public franchise. [read post]