Search for: "ARIZONA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY v STATE OF ARIZONA"
Results 201 - 220
of 300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Specifically, the plaintiffs—individual Arizona voters—complained that the commission “diluted or inflated the votes of almost two million American citizens when [it] intentionally and systematically overpopulated sixteen Republican districts while underpopulating eleven Democrat districts . . . with the intent of creating an advantage for the Democratic party. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
” At The Hill, Jessie Hellmann reports on remarks by Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona, who said on Sunday “that his colleagues should approve President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee if it appears the Republican Party will lose the White House in November. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
The plaintiffs in the case, a group of Arizona voters, argued that the commission had not distributed Arizona residents evenly among the state legislative districts: it put too many people in some Republican districts, while it put too few in some Democratic districts. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:36 am
In 2012, the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission redrew the map for the state legislative districts based on the results of the 2010 census. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
See Oachs v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 1:57 pm
The first issue before the Court on Tuesday arises from Harris’s accusation that the commission over-populated some of the districts that it drew in the post-2010 legislative maps to favor the Democratic Party. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In particular, the plaintiffs—individual Arizona voters—complain that the commission “diluted or inflated the votes of almost two million American citizens when [it] intentionally and systematically overpopulated sixteen Republican districts while underpopulating eleven Democrat districts . . . with the intent of creating an advantage for the Democratic party. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
Nat’l Conservative Political Action Comm., 470 U.S. 480, 496 (1985); political parties, Colo. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Arizona, Reynolds v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
She is critical, for example, of O’Connor’s role in Arizona’s failure to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s, observing that “O’Connor was caught between her ambitions in a conservative Republican Party and her professed concern for women’s rights. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Panels of particular interest to our readers include:Plenary: State Building: Democratic and ManagerialChair: Alice O’Connor, UCSBMeg Jacobs, Princeton University, “Reconsidering Regulation in the New Deal andBeyond”K. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
In a 1966 decision, in a Hawaii state legislative redistricting case, Burns v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:03 pm
In an end-of-the-term flurry that was not lacking in forceful dissents, Chief Justice Roberts’ dissent in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Last week’s ruling by the Supreme Court in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
The Supreme Court on Thursday narrowed somewhat its plan to review the work of the independent Arizona agency that drew new election districts for the state legislature after the latest census. [read post]
