Search for: "Adoption of Barnett"
Results 201 - 220
of 451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2011, 8:50 am
A statute charged the Railroad Commission with evaluating whether the “public interest” supported granting permits for injection drilling in the Barnett Shale. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:26 pm
The really dangerous element of the majority opinion is that it adopts the highly deferential “rational basis” test for assessing assertions of power under the Necessary and Proper Clause, holding that “in determining whether the Necessary and Proper Clause grants Congress the legislative authority to enact a particular federal statute, we look to see whether the statute constitutes a means that is rationally related to the implementation of a constitutionally enumerated… [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 3:09 pm
These come overwhelmingly from lawyers and judges in the Ninth Circuit; they are overwhelmingly opposed to Rule 32.1; and they overwhelmingly predict dire results if the rule is adopted. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 9:27 am
Georgia and Popular Sovereignty by Randy Barnett. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:43 am
Adopt a moratorium on audits relating to the general welfare exclusion doctrine while implementing Notice 2012-75 4. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm
Barnett Shale Drilling Increased North Texas Ozone – Fact or Fiction? [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
But where are the leading conservative constitutional thinkers on this – Mike McConnell, Eugene Volokh, Randy Barnett, Gary Lawson, and Steve Calabresi? [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
But where issues are truly important, precedential "reasoning" has relatively little to be said for it If I shared Randy Barnett's, Richard Epstein's, or Clarence Thomas's views of constitutional meaning and, more importantly, what constituted the most desirable kind of polity, then I would have no particular commitment to maintaining New Deal precedents in all of their glory. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 6:48 am
If the facts alleged in the complaint are true, then Mandala and Barnett are vivid examples of the adverse impact an absolute convictions bar can have on individuals generally -- and African Americans in particular -- seeking employment. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
", the panelists, Pascal Belmin (Airbus), Justus Haucap (Duesseldorf Institute for Competition Economics), Can Huang (Zhejiang University), Paul Seabright (Toulouse School of Economics) and Jim Venit (Dentons), and moderator Richard Sousa (Hoover Institution) discussed a number of questions, inter alia: how do societies adopt their laws and industrial market in the 21st century? [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Samito provides the backstory and analysis of Lincoln’s real role in the adoption of the amendment. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm
This legislation was adopted with overwhelming support in each chamber. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm
Barnett: Deloitte has a report: a lot of these TMCH records come from the US, Europe. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:53 pm
Constitution: "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President . . . . [read post]
16 May 2023, 5:01 am
As I said yesterday, some people, like Randy Barnett, think it means what it says and protects rights beyond those enumerated. [read post]
30 May 2013, 10:00 am
The book has a foreword by Randy Barnett. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am
However, as I shall explain in future posts, both Hamburger’s and the scholars’ brief adopt equally plausible positions if one begins from the assumption that the Privileges or Immunities Clause is based on Article IV of the original Constitution. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:39 am
Ritter and Barnett studied a Little Rock merit pay program. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:02 am
Barnett argues that construction must be guided by a theory of constitutional legitimacy that emphasizes justice. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:50 am
Randy Barnett has argued that an originalist judge like Justice Scalia should not have taken certain positions in commerce clause cases, and so on. [read post]
