Search for: "Advocates v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 12,808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2024, 7:08 am
Supreme Court’s 1993 decision in Harris v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
” This continues the sordid state of affairs that existed prior to the pandemic, where hundreds of criminal cases were being dismissed annually for delay[9]. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:11 pm
The civil cover sheet marked the case as related to Corbitt v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
With Monday’s oral arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
People of State of Ill. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:04 pm
From Roe v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
During the oral argument yesterday in Murthy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 3:01 am
” While the Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm
National Rifle Association v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:06 pm
Exclusionary zoning is permitted under Euclid v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
This post provides a brief update.On March 26, Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
In 1948, the Supreme Court outlawed these practices in the seminal case, Shelly v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:23 am
As the NRA notes in its brief, former Governor Andrew Cuomo has stated that “firearms advocates ‘have no place in the state of New York’” Pet’r’s Merits Br. at 8. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
One group advocating for an Article V convention is U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
For instance, the 1993 California case Johnson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Billionaire-funded advocates declare that the United States is a “shell” of a republic and concede that their goal is to topple the government as it stands. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]