Search for: "Alabama v. Arizona" Results 201 - 220 of 569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2017, 9:47 am by Amy Howe
The justices turned aside, without comment, renewed requests by death row inmates in Alabama and Arkansas to review their cases. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
  The order also indicates that the oral argument in Lucia v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Register, Thomas Claburn looks at Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am by MBettman
Alabama, 132 S.Ct. 2455 (2012) (Forbids imposition of mandatory life without parole sentence for juvenile homicide offenders.) [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Haeger, an upcoming case in which the court “is using an Arizona couple’s product liability lawsuit to determine how far federal judges can go when punishing attorneys who hide information. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 2:45 pm
  Making a death row inmate propose the method of execution, the product of the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Glossip v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
As phrased by the veteran in Merrill, these cases ask whether “the Arizona Supreme Court err[ed] in circumventing Mansell under the guise that post-divorce waivers of retired pay are different than pre-divorce waivers. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:30 am
Since the ruling, abortion restrictions in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Oklahoma and Wisconsin have already been struck down or been permanently blocked. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Graber, the Arizona District Court’s Chief Judge Raner C. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS, Sandra Park looks at Lynch v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 11:54 am by CJLF Staff
Florida, and also challenged the Alabama's lethal injection protocol. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
The justices returned the cases of several Arizona inmates to the state courts, instructing those courts to take another look at the cases in light of last term’s decision in Montgomery v. [read post]