Search for: "All Unknown Parties Claiming Interests by , Through Under or Against A Named Defendant"
Results 201 - 220
of 256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
Mesa, 15-118, pits against one Jesus against another. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
Of course all these people would have every right to speak out against same-sex weddings, Catholicism, the Democratic Party, unions, and Israel. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:46 am
He goes on: “[I]ntermediary liability is imposed through privacy and data protection laws. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 5:58 pm
I see so many people defend me here. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
E.g., the classic Chanel case, allowing not just imitation but advertising of the fact of the imitation through use of the TM. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 3:16 pm
For that reason, coverage under first-party property policies has been front and center. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
Himmelreich, 15-109, is a Federal Tort Claims Act case that asks “[w]hether a final judgment in an action brought under Section 1346(b) dismissing the claim on the ground that relief is precluded by one of the Federal Tort Claims Act’s exceptions to liability, 28 U.S.C. 2680, bars a subsequent action by the claimant against the federal employees whose acts gave rise to the FTCA claim. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:10 am
W = (CPI) (Pr) (CPI) (Pr) + (1 - Pr)W = Probability of PaternityCPI = Combined Paternity IndexPr = Prior ProbabilityBest Interest of the Child: The legal standard or doctrine for making child-related decisions.Biological Father: The man who provided the paternal genetic material of a child.Burden of Proof: The party asserting a claim must prove such claim is true. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
(3) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the second degree if serious bodily injury results from the defendant operating the auto or vessel while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) while: (a) on any school property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board, or within 1,000 feet of such school property; (b) driving through a school crossing as defined in R.S.39:1-1 if the… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
., Defendant-Appellant.JERRY LEIBER, individually and doing business as, JERRY LEIBER MUSIC; MIKE STOLLER and FRANK MUSIC CORP., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
Google: performer didn’t fix performance under her authority. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
In terms of a civil lawsuit by the victims against Penn State, like with the Annie Le wrongful death case against Yale, in every state I know of employers may be directly liable for the negligent hiring, retention or supervision of an employee who, through a tortious or criminal act, injures a third party. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 2:09 am
It supersedes all previous 2006 Lists posted on this blawg. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
To fund all that travel, advertising, and election gear, parties will be spending a lot of money. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
But Lewis thought the song was a rip-off of “I Want a New Drug” and asserted a copyright infringement claim against Columbia Pictures. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
In Andrews, the Law Society of British Columbia—which was a party to the action—had vigourously defended the citizenship requirement, arguing, inter alia, that the “vital role” role lawyers play in governmental processes and in the administration of justice justified the rule. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:09 pm
The Strategy states that all service providers must make reasonable attempts to secure the use of their infrastructure against abuse or other criminal behavior. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Arbitration under Attack Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation (Penn State), Vol. 3, p. 93, 2011David Allen Larson Hamline University - School of Law Abstract: During the past few years arbitration has been under attack. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Some highly experienced law of war experts inside the military would eventually conclude (following the "gap" argument about GC3 and GC4) that they should be treated instead as spies and saboteurs under GC4, but no one so far as I know suggested that they would be POWs, and the White House lawyers did not have the background knowledge really to understand that (the role of David Addington in this debate is unknown to me, but I do wonder). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
¶¶ 23, 56, and a man who told them his name was “Emanuel,” id. [read post]
